Has Anyone Cracked Online Casino Algarythums
| 5 votes (18.51%) | |
| 14 votes (51.85%) | |
| 3 votes (11.11%) | |
| 3 votes (11.11%) | |
| No votes (0%) | |
| 1 vote (3.7%) | |
| 1 vote (3.7%) |
- Has Anyone Cracked Online Casino Algorithms Play
- Online Casino No Deposit Bonus
- Has Anyone Cracked Online Casino Algorithms Games
- Has Anyone Cracked Online Casino Algorithms Free
People visiting this online retail giant often have a single goal — to make a purchase. The search box, aka Amazon’s internal search engine, powers these purchases by providing the most relevant product suggestions. Amazon’s search engine algorithm — the A9 — ensures that searchers get the most relevant results for their queries. A fun, satisfying, and extremely stupid way to give away your money.As I was walking through GTA Online's new Diamond Casino yesterday, I noticed a couple of the virtual slot machines had Wheel of.
27 members have voted
Administrator
Perhaps in an effort to address such skepticism, BetVoyager casino offers a way that they say guarantees fairness. It works like this, if I understand it correctly.
1. A 64-digit code is given to the player in the top of the screen before he makes a bet. This is called the 'checksum.'
2. The player makes his bet and the game plays out.
3. At the conclusion of the game, the player may click a check mark. If he does, he will be taken to a screen showing the predestined outcome or cards in the game.
4. If the player clicks 'calculate checksum,' then the game will translate the text of the game outcome into a checksum. The player can compare it to the checksum he was given before the game and will see that it matches.
Here are a couple links that explain it in more detail:
Randomness control
Randomness control in roulette video
Personally, I applaud this! While I maintain that most major Internet casinos do not cheat, I always favor open and honest gambling. This is a great step in that direction. Of course, I'm sure there will still be some skeptics.
I also wonder if the hackers out there are trying to figure out how the checksum translator works. If one knew how, he could gamble with perfect knowledge of the outcome. This is getting out of my area, but I suspect they are using semi-prime numbers, which can take orders of magnitude greater than the age of the universe to crack. Then again, if one could hack into the computer of whoever designed this ...
The question for the poll is do you trust this encryption?
Description of how SHA-256 works (warning: not for mathophobes)
The only question I have is, in craps, what happens if you have a point established when your current set of rolls runs out? Do you have to request a new set? This could be cumbersome for the player.
Administrator
The only question I have is, in craps, what happens if you have a point established when your current set of rolls runs out? Do you have to request a new set? This could be cumbersome for the player.
Good question. I tried this and it seems to me that only the first ten rolls are predestined. I had an 12-roll run but it gave me only the first ten of them:
Has Anyone Cracked Online Casino Algorithms Play
rolls : 1-3 4, 2-6 2, 3-1 1, 4-4 5, 5-6 4, 6-4 3, 7-5 5, 8-4 4, 9-6 3, 10-6 3; server code word : iSQxNPrK5UZ7L6GrEe9gLOupfuLWeERr
Later...Upon further playing, it seems like every ten rolls it gives the player a new checksum. The skeptical player can always copy and paste them as he goes and translate them later.
However, it can be beaten, by a reverse lookup dictionary. This is the same method used to 'hack' encrypted passwords.
You don't need to decrypt the hashcode. By definition, a hash algorythm isn't reversable, anyway.
You and all of your buddies just record every hashcode and the rolls it represents. If anyone ever encounters a hashcode that has happened before, you clean up.
If anyone figures out or comes by the code to generate the hashcode, you set your computers to work generating hashcodes and recording them and the rolls they represent.
I think it is a good idea in theory.
However, it can be beaten, by a reverse lookup dictionary. This is the same method used to 'hack' encrypted passwords.
You don't need to decrypt the hashcode. By definition, a hash algorythm isn't reversable, anyway.
You and all of your buddies just record every hashcode and the rolls it represents. If anyone ever encounters a hashcode that has happened before, you clean up.
If anyone figures out or comes by the code to generate the hashcode, you set your computers to work generating hashcodes and recording them and the rolls they represent.
Administrator
I think it is a good idea in theory.
However, it can be beaten, by a reverse lookup dictionary. This is the same method used to 'hack' encrypted passwords.
You don't need to decrypt the hashcode. By definition, a hash algorythm isn't reversable, anyway.
You and all of your buddies just record every hashcode and the rolls it represents. If anyone ever encounters a hashcode that has happened before, you clean up.
If anyone figures out or comes by the code to generate the hashcode, you set your computers to work generating hashcodes and recording them and the rolls they represent.
They always throw in a long series of what look like random characters to create more Checksum combinations. It is such a long sequence that I think it would be unlikely to see the same one twice. Then again, I've been wrong before.
You quote BetVoyager in your link. From 'ThePogg' http://thepogg.com/casino-review/bet-voyager/
Bet Voyager use their own proprietary software called GameSys.
That's hardly reassuring. They score a 6/10 on 'trustworthiness' on ThePogg. Here is their licensing info, as given on ThePogg:
Bet Voyager are licensed by the Curacao Egaming ( http://www.curacao-egaming.com/index-4.html). From a player’s perspective Curacao are wildly seen to be a weak regulatory authority.
This checksum idea seems like fluff. They should have Charles at CFG do the chi-square testing, etc., on their data log files, and have him directly inspect the code, so that they can get properly certified.
Mike, as you very well know, almost no cheating at Internet casinos arises because of a rigged RNG. That myth is perpetuated by rogue online casinos that boast having their RNG tested, approved, etc. TST and eCogra are happy to do this testing, and I have no doubt that the RNGs are fair. It is all in the programming. So, if the RNG behaves fairly, but the programming that uses the outcomes produced by the RNG is rogue, how does this change anything? Maybe I don't understand.
You quote BetVoyager in your link. From 'ThePogg' http://thepogg.com/casino-review/bet-voyager/
That's hardly reassuring. They score a 6/10 on 'trustworthiness' on ThePogg. Here is their licensing info, as given on ThePogg:
This checksum idea seems like fluff. They should have Charles at CFG do the chi-square testing, etc., on their data log files and get properly certified.
Online Casino No Deposit Bonus
The checksum does not gurantee randomness. It just tells you there is no past posting by the casino. But withiut the hashing algorithm being exposed so a player can run it themselves after the results, its meaningless. All we know is that a code was generated that refers to a series of ten results. Not that those ten results generate the checksum.Has Anyone Cracked Online Casino Algorithms Games
I would assume to increase the variability of the checksum more data is added to the hash than just the results. Like date and time, for instance.